Tag: non-technical metal leather blokes

I'd like to think doing an own goal on the Net is known as doing a Metallica; like being Dooced, it's where you go against your own fans (as with Metallica and Napster, and recently having a go at bloggers daring to write about them). But that's restricted to aging non-technical metal leather blokes right? WRONG. Let me tell you a story: There's an unsigned rock band in Scotland, they've got a buzz around them, mostly created around demos pushed around the internet with the band's permission. They do an interview with a blogger, who posts some of the said demos with the band's permission. The band becomes a hot ticket as part of all this attention, and signs with a major label. So everyone's happy then? Band have got big deal, blogger and others who caught on early got the scoops, the fans got the demos and are likely to buy the LP to hear the final tracks and others. All butterflies, yellow brick roads, unicorns and fluffy kittens? Nope. What actually happened was over a week ago the blogger, Ed from 17seconds got a DMCA takedown via Google/Blogger from Columbia, for an interview done before Glasvegas, the band, signed with them. The kicker? Well the tracks weren't even available anymore. And originally were there with the band's permission (implicit or otherwise, they were posted free at their site I think); when they owned all the rights, anyway, as they were then unsigned. What this reveals is the utter stupidity (and doing a Metallica-ness, damn need to work on those verbs) of Google, Columbia (aka Sony BMG), Glasvegas and the DMCA. Google for pulling stuff without question - like Prince does with NPG Productions on YouTube, using the DMCA like confetti even when he doesn't own the rights - Columbia for obviously doing a standard 'buy everything' deal with Glasvegas, and then strangely infuriating the fans and bloggers who put the band in the charts by regarding their initial promotional support as reason for litigation, Glasvegas for doing what bands like the Clash did before them and sign with $$$s in their eyes not realising probably what complete CONtrol means and probably not caring about the people who got them there, and DMCA evil piece of litigation that made this whole sad sorry state of affairs possible (apparently right or wrong the offending piece has to be taken down for 10-14 days? Is that true? If so, that is really a chilling effect). Now where does it leave us? There seems to be one of the periodic crackdowns atm - Teenage Kicks have been threatened also, although that was the Baitles who tbh are like Prince litigious as feck. And no-one wants defends the rights to post 'illegal music' do they? What tends to be less said is that these are less than 'illegitimate' bloggers in most cases, they've got the go-ahead, the contacts etc - and still get hassle even after being told it's OK. So the official route is no less difficult, but 'legit' or not the record labels and their pluggers and marketers depend on these blogs in part to promote their music - they court them, as they do with DJs and remixers with acapellas and instrumentals, they lure them with the latest tracks. It's no suprise, there isn't a darkened back door where these 'demo' or pre-release MP3s are leaking out like fleeing rats; the record labels GIVE THEM to the blogs. Or the bands, or the marketing departments, or managers, or agents. So hence irony of turning around and biting the hand that feeds you. What to do? Well what about this - goto the Glasvegas Myspace page. Befriend them. Post a message pointing to 17seconds or the Don't be Evil post. Then unfriend them ;-) Tell your friends not to buy Glasvegas's album and/or download or give them a copy until Ed or someone hears back. In fact fuck it boycott all Sony BMG if you want (who due to a contact I used to have used to be quite cool about all this, regularly releasing tracks for remix and review, unlike another frequent offender EMI who I'm glad to see are going down the pan May they rot in hell. They caused my own Cease and Desist - ooh remember them? How quaint they seem now - but anyway it's sad to see Sony BMG join that cabal of stupidity). Because I'm sure, Glasvegas being a Glaswegian band might not like being asked whether they are men or whether they are mice. Or that they are just now Columbia's prison bitches...and might see these messages and respond. Doubtful, but one can try.

Tag: non-technical metal leather blokes

Complete CONtrol; or how Glasvegas and Columbia need to get a clue

Search by Category:

Random Podcast

RC 292: Halloween Queen

RC 274: Winter Kills

Like Our Work? Support Us!

PLAY THAT FUNKY MUSIC

RC 395: River Is Beatiful – Radio Clash Podcast